The best Side of case law 395 ppc acquittal

The best Side of case law 395 ppc acquittal

Blog Article

“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any with the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din observed firstly the deceased and after some distance they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not imply that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This sort of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of past viewed.

Delay in recording confessional statement might not be treated fatal into the case of prosecution(Murder Trial)

These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and include all notable cases decided by the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.

Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” will not be binding, but could possibly be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance to your party’s argument, or to guide the present court.

The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is an extensive piece of legislation that defines numerous criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for those found guilty.

Reasonable grounds can be found within the record to attach the petitioner with the commission of the alleged offence. Nevertheless punishment with the alleged offence does not fall from the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. still acquired Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising away from FIR No. 1250/2024 dated 10.05.2024 registered under Section 489-File, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is while in the credit with the petitioner as accused, therefore, case of the petitioner falls from the exception where bail cannot be granted even inside the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, direction continues to be sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion with the same is hereby reproduced:

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

Normally, only an appeal accepted through the court of final resort will resolve such differences and, for many reasons, such appeals are frequently not granted.

I)       The above referred case FIR, with the murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered to the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid who is father of your petitioner and as per Tale of FIR, the petitioner is surely an eyewkness on the incidence.

 Criminal cases While in the common legislation tradition, courts decide the legislation applicable into a case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Not like most civil legislation systems, common legislation systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their very own previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lower courts should make decisions regular with the previous decisions of higher courts.

[3] For example, in England, the High Court and the Court of Appeals are Each and every bound by their have previous decisions, however, Because the Practice Statement 1966 the Supreme Court in the United Kingdom can deviate from its earlier decisions, Whilst in practice it seldom does. A notable example of when the court has overturned its precedent is the case of R v Jogee, where the Supreme Court on the United Kingdom ruled that it plus the other courts of England and Wales had misapplied the regulation for approximately thirty years.

A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition on the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Growth Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in click here their neighborhood, on designated “green belt” property. The Court listened to the matter as a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) in the Pakistan Constitution presents unique jurisdiction towards the Supreme Court to take up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.

The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were instructed on the boy’s past, they asked if their children were Harmless with him in their home. The therapist assured them that that they had practically nothing to fret about.